The religious period of the Spiritism
Marco Milani
Text published in the Digital
Magazine Candeia Espírita, issue 27, Dec/2023, p.6-7
In the December 1863 edition of the
Revue Spirite, Allan Kardec pointed out six periods that would mark the
evolutionary march of Spiritism. Beginning with the curiosity aroused by
physical phenomena, the development of Spiritist ideas in society would pass
through the philosophical, struggle, religious, intermediate, and finally, the
period of social regeneration.
From an optimistic perspective,
Kardec believed that by the dawn of the 20th century, Spiritism would already
be fully disseminated worldwide to such an extent that it would effectively
promote solidarity and brotherhood among individuals, directly influencing the
improvement of social interactions.
However, Kardec's optimism did not
materialize within the predicted timeframe. This doesn't imply that the
development of Spiritist ideas hasn't continued its course. It's merely that
the terrestrial chronological notion wasn't accurately expressed.
In fact, when Kardec passed away in
1869, Spiritism was in the period of struggle, and even today, it can be
situated in that same period [1]. The transition to the subsequent period,
therefore, depends on overcoming elements contrary to the spread of Spiritist
ideas in their essence and entirety.
The fourth period requires a
contextual understanding of how Kardec himself characterized Spiritism and
juxtaposed it with the adopted concepts of religion.
As a personal premise, Kardec
cherished objectivity and clarity, guided by logical thinking. In this regard,
any prediction about the evolution of Spiritism would mirror what he and the
Spirits indicated as a natural consequence of the advancement of doctrinal
ideas without any manifestation of logical inconsistency. Thus, when he termed
the fourth period as religious, he obviously did not refer to the traditional
concept of religion, which he vehemently denied having any resemblance to
Spiritism.
As elucidated in his speech given at
the Parisian Society of Spiritist Studies on November 1st, 1868, and published
in the December 1868 edition of the Revue Spirite, Spiritism can be understood
as a religion exclusively in the philosophical sense, strengthening the bonds
of fraternity and communion of thoughts, based on the laws of nature.
In that same speech, Kardec rejected
the classification of Spiritism as a religion from the typically accepted
perspective linked to worship practices and all others already manifested in
established religions.
Hence, one should not associate
Kardec's denomination of the religious period with the traditional perspective
but rather with the philosophical view of a bond uniting its adherents around
the same doctrinal ideal and the promotion of charity as a common practice.
Currently, the popular concept of
religion remains tied to worship and outward practices, which distorts the
understanding of the fourth period foreseen by Kardec if considered in this
manner.
For reflection: a logical
contradiction is a situation where two statements or propositions oppose each
other in such a way that both cannot be true simultaneously in the same
context. Logically speaking, the relationship between two declarations that are
mutually exclusive cannot coexist due to their direct incompatibility. As
Spiritism is a religion in the philosophical sense, not in the traditional
sense, it commits a logical contradiction for those who suppose that the
religious period proposed by Kardec is linked to the traditional concept of
religion.
In summary, the religious period will
be recognized as such when marked by affectionate bonds among its adherents, by
reasoned faith that strengthens its doctrinal unity, and by the practice of
charity in its essence [2].
[1] See the article "The Period
of Struggle of Spiritism," authored by me, published in the Revista
Dirigente Espírita, issue 197, Sept/Oct 2023, p. 18-19. Link: https://usesp.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/reDE-197.pdf
[2] See question 886 in The Spirits' Book.

No comments:
Post a Comment